Published on in Vol 9, No 2 (2017):

Geographic Information Systems: Usability, Perception, and Preferences of Public Health Professionals

Geographic Information Systems: Usability, Perception, and Preferences of Public Health Professionals

Geographic Information Systems: Usability, Perception, and Preferences of Public Health Professionals

The full text of this article is available as a PDF download by clicking here.

Journals

  1. van der Meer L, Waelput A, Steegers E, Bertens L. Creating a sense of urgency and provoking action – An example on the use of heat maps to address perinatal health inequalities. Preventive Medicine Reports 2022;30:102058 View
  2. Kost G. Geospatial Science and Point-of-Care Testing: Creating Solutions for Population Access, Emergencies, Outbreaks, and Disasters. Frontiers in Public Health 2019;7 View
  3. Wang Y, Wan Z. Spatial autocorrelation and stratified heterogeneity in the evaluation of breast cancer risk inequity and socioeconomic factors analysis in China: Evidence from Nanchang, Jiangxi Province. Geospatial Health 2022;17(1) View
  4. Cheng F, Chen C, Lee M, Chiang C. Analysis of spatial accessibility of dental institutions in Taiwan: The application of a geographical information system software. Journal of Dental Sciences 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Zaragozí B, Rodríguez-Sala J, Trilles S, Ramón-Morte A. Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management. View