This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Review Articles (31)

Published on in Vol 5, No 2 (2013):

Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews

Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews

Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews

Authors of this article:

Dean Giustini1 ;   Maged N. Kamel Boulos2
The full text of this article is available as a PDF download by clicking here.
Article Authors Cited by (102) Tweetations (24) Metrics

Journals

  1. Fuller T, Peters J, Pearson M, Anderson R. Impact of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs Reporting Guideline: Ten Years On. American Journal of Public Health 2014;104(11):e110 View
  2. Williamson M, Jacoby D, Piper A. The drivers of anguillid eel movement in lentic water bodies: a systematic map. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 2023 View
  3. Gkiouras K, Nigdelis M, Grammatikopoulou M, Goulis D. Tracing open data in emergencies: The case of the COVID‐19 pandemic. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2020;50(9) View
  4. Campo K, Teper T, Eaton C, Shipman A, Bhatia G, Mesmer B. Model‐based systems engineering: Evaluating perceived value, metrics, and evidence through literature. Systems Engineering 2023;26(1):104 View
  5. Farmer J, Kenny A, McKinstry C, Huysmans R. A scoping review of the association between rural medical education and rural practice location. Human Resources for Health 2015;13(1) View
  6. Burns C, Nix T, Shapiro R, Huber J, Mughal M. MEDLINE search retrieval issues: A longitudinal query analysis of five vendor platforms. PLOS ONE 2021;16(5):e0234221 View
  7. Muszyńska K. A bibliometric review of research on communication in virtual project teams. Procedia Computer Science 2021;192:4770 View
  8. Halevi G, Moed H, Bar-Ilan J. Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature. Journal of Informetrics 2017;11(3):823 View
  9. Swacha J. State of Research on Gamification in Education: A Bibliometric Survey. Education Sciences 2021;11(2):69 View
  10. Klopfenstein D, Dampier W. Commentary to Gusenbauer and Haddaway 2020: Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar andPubMed. Research Synthesis Methods 2021;12(2):126 View
  11. Chen Y. Better to give? A systematic review of prosocial spending and happiness. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2023;64(6):838 View
  12. Boase N, White M, Gaze W, Redshaw C. Evaluating the Mental Models Approach to Developing a Risk Communication: A Scoping Review of the Evidence. Risk Analysis 2017;37(11):2132 View
  13. Pistone A, Ludovico D, De Mari Casareto Dal Verme L, Leggieri S, Canali C, Caldwell D. Modelling and control of manipulators for inspection and maintenance in challenging environments: A literature review. Annual Reviews in Control 2024;57:100949 View
  14. Eaton C, Banks A, Weger K, Mesmer B, Moreland R. Understanding perceived influencers on project outcomes and quantifying disciplinary similarities in academic literature. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2023;40(3):460 View
  15. Shang C, Moss A, Chen A. The expectancy-value theory: A meta-analysis of its application in physical education. Journal of Sport and Health Science 2023;12(1):52 View
  16. Suryavanshi T, Lambert S, Lal S, Chin A, Chan T. Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Health Sciences Education: a Scoping Review. Medical Science Educator 2020;30(4):1797 View
  17. Klebel T, Reichmann S, Polka J, McDowell G, Penfold N, Hindle S, Ross-Hellauer T, Useche S. Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals. PLOS ONE 2020;15(10):e0239518 View
  18. Trede F, McEwen C, Kenny A, O'Meara P. Supervisors' experiences of workplace supervision of nursing and paramedic students in rural settings: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today 2014;34(5):783 View
  19. Daniel E, Oshodi O. Lean-offsite-simulation nexus for housing construction: a state-of-the-art review of the existing knowledge. Construction Innovation 2023;23(5):994 View
  20. Morshed T, Hayden S. Google Versus PubMed: Comparison of Google and PubMed’s Search Tools for Answering Clinical Questions in the Emergency Department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2020;75(3):408 View
  21. Pastor-Ramón E, Herrera-Peco I, Agirre O, García-Puente M, Morán J. Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 2022;12(5):458 View
  22. Linder S, Kamath G, Pratt G, Saraykar S, Volk R. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2015;68(4):412 View
  23. Dickson-Swift V, Kenny A, Farmer J, Gussy M, Larkins S. Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools. BMC Oral Health 2014;14(1) View
  24. Martin‐Raugh M, Williams K, Lentini J. The Malleability of Workplace‐Relevant Noncognitive Constructs: Empirical Evidence From 39 Meta‐Analyses and Reviews. ETS Research Report Series 2020;2020(1):1 View
  25. Vanhala E, Kasurinen J, Knutas A, Herala A. The Application Domains of Systematic Mapping Studies: A Mapping Study of the First Decade of Practice With the Method. IEEE Access 2022;10:37924 View
  26. Gusenbauer M, Haddaway N. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods 2020;11(2):181 View
  27. Nuttman-Shwartz O. The Long-Term Effects of Living in a Shared and Continuous Traumatic Reality: The Case of Israeli Families on the Border With Gaza. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 2023;24(3):1387 View
  28. Rico Lugo S, Kimita K, Nishino N. Characteristics of decision process towards circular food economy: A review. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain 2023;7:100104 View
  29. Mine K, Nakayama T, Milanese S, Grimmer K. Effects of microwave diathermy on signs and symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness: a systematic review of Japanese primary studies. Physical Therapy Reviews 2015;20(5-6):290 View
  30. Earnshaw C, Edwin C, Bhat J, Krishnan M, Mamais C, Somashekar S, Sunil A, Williams S, Leong S. An analysis of the fate of 917 manuscripts rejected from Clinical Otolaryngology. Clinical Otolaryngology 2017;42(3):709 View
  31. Rovira C, Codina L, Lopezosa C. Language Bias in the Google Scholar Ranking Algorithm. Future Internet 2021;13(2):31 View
  32. Tolks D, Schmidt J, Kuhn S. The Role of AI in Serious Games and Gamification for Health: Scoping Review. JMIR Serious Games 2024;12:e48258 View
  33. Ukwoma S, Ngulube P. Research Productivity and the Citation of Open and Distance Learning Journals (2009-2018): A Citation Analysis. American Journal of Distance Education 2022;36(3):193 View
  34. Haddaway N, Collins A, Coughlin D, Kirk S, Wray K. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching. PLOS ONE 2015;10(9):e0138237 View
  35. Kimport K, Littlejohn K. What are We Forgetting? Sexuality, Sex, and Embodiment in Abortion Research. The Journal of Sex Research 2021;58(7):863 View
  36. Borycz J, Carroll A, Eskridge H. STEM Abstracting and Indexing (A&I) Tool Overlap Analysis in 2020: An Open Science Informed Approach Amid Pandemic Budgets. Journal of eScience Librarianship 2021;10(2) View
  37. Cochran J, Kattan A, Langner U, Knochel A, Carvalho S, Coker D, Fitzgerald L, Ford K, Justo M, Hardenstine R, McIvor A, Peinemann V, Pombo-Ayora L, Predragovic M, Rich W, Scott K, Shchepanik H, Tanabe L, Tietbohl M, Williams C, Berumen M. Fine-scale spatial and temporal trends in Red Sea coral reef research. Regional Studies in Marine Science 2024;71:103404 View
  38. DiFilippo K, Huang W, Andrade J, Chapman-Novakofski K. The use of mobile apps to improve nutrition outcomes: A systematic literature review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2015;21(5):243 View
  39. Lunny C, Salzwedel D, Liu T, Ramasubbu C, Gerrish S, Puil L, Mintzes B, Wright J. Validation of five search filters for retrieval of clinical practice guidelines produced low precision. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2020;117:109 View
  40. Hannousse A. Searching relevant papers for software engineering secondary studies: Semantic Scholar coverage and identification role. IET Software 2021;15(1):126 View
  41. Quitmann C, Griesel S, Nayna Schwerdtle P, Danquah I, Herrmann A. Climate-sensitive health counselling: a scoping review and conceptual framework. The Lancet Planetary Health 2023;7(7):e600 View
  42. George S, Duran N, Norris K. A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Minority Research Participation Among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health 2014;104(2):e16 View
  43. Chertow M, Kanaoka K, Park J. Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2021;25(4):913 View
  44. Hartling L, Guise J, Hempel S, Featherstone R, Mitchell M, Motu’apuaka M, Robinson K, Schoelles K, Totten A, Whitlock E, Wilt T, Anderson J, Berliner E, Gozu A, Kato E, Paynter R, Umscheid C. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews. Systematic Reviews 2017;6(1) View
  45. Williamson M, Tebbs E, Dawson T, Jacoby D. Satellite Remote Sensing in Shark and Ray Ecology, Conservation and Management. Frontiers in Marine Science 2019;6 View
  46. Trede F, Sutton K, Bernoth M. Conceptualisations and perceptions of the nurse preceptor's role: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today 2016;36:268 View
  47. Loper A, Jensen T, Farley A, Morgan J, Metz A. A Systematic Review of Approaches for Continuous Quality Improvement Capacity-Building. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 2022;28(2):E354 View
  48. Adebayo S, Saini M. A scientometric study for scientific research publication on gender inequality. Quality & Quantity 2023;57(6):5107 View
  49. Ceylan H, Güngören N, Küçükdurmaz F. Tips and tricks for using the internet for professional purposes. EFORT Open Reviews 2017;2(5):126 View
  50. Lamy J, Séroussi B, Griffon N, Kerdelhué G, Jaulent M, Bouaud J. Toward a Formalization of the Process to Select IMIA Yearbook Best Papers. Methods of Information in Medicine 2015;54(02):135 View
  51. Daker-White G, Hays R, McSharry J, Giles S, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Rhodes P, Sanders C, Macleod U. Blame the Patient, Blame the Doctor or Blame the System? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies of Patient Safety in Primary Care. PLOS ONE 2015;10(8):e0128329 View
  52. Pilipiec P, Liwicki M, Bota A. Using Machine Learning for Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics 2022;14(2):266 View
  53. Pottier P, Lin H, Oh R, Pollo P, Rivera-Villanueva A, Valdebenito J, Yang Y, Amano T, Burke S, Drobniak S, Nakagawa S. A comprehensive database of amphibian heat tolerance. Scientific Data 2022;9(1) View
  54. Dawson P, van der Meer J, Skalicky J, Cowley K. On the Effectiveness of Supplemental Instruction. Review of Educational Research 2014;84(4):609 View
  55. Faggi A, Bartolini-Lucenti S, Rook L. Assessing the scientific value and vulnerability of paleontological sites: a new analytic operational procedure. Frontiers in Earth Science 2023;11 View
  56. Boeker M, Vach W, Motschall E. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013;13(1) View
  57. Ramirez D, Foster M, Kogut A, Xiao D. Adherence to systematic review standards: Impact of librarian involvement in Campbell Collaboration's education reviews. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2022;48(5):102567 View
  58. Kanmodi K, Egbedina E, Nkhata M, Nnyanzi L. Experiences with Cling Film and Dental Dam Use in Oral Sex: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. Oral 2023;3(2):215 View
  59. Briscoe S. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme. BMC Research Notes 2015;8(1) View
  60. Cobbold J, Morgan A. An integrative review of the prevalence, patterns and predictors of self-medication in Ghana. Cogent Public Health 2022;9(1) View
  61. Horsman G. The challenges surrounding the regulation of anonymous communication provision in the United Kingdom. Computers & Security 2016;56:151 View
  62. Hartt M, Lee C, Empey-Salisbury M. Planning for Play? A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Literature 2024;39(1):25 View
  63. Guedes J, Moura M, Alexandre F. Diniz‐Filho J. Species out of sight: elucidating the determinants of research effort in global reptiles. Ecography 2023;2023(3) View
  64. Nitta S, Maeda T, Koudounas S, Minematsu T, Tobe H, Weller C, Sanada H. Which objective itch‐assessment tools are applicable to patients with advanced cognitive impairments? A scoping review. International Journal of Older People Nursing 2022;17(5) View
  65. Obenson K. To what extent if any has Twitter disrupted hierarchies in forensic pathology?. Forensic Science International: Synergy 2020;2:144 View
  66. Rovira C, Codina L, Guerrero-Solé F, Lopezosa C. Ranking by Relevance and Citation Counts, a Comparative Study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus. Future Internet 2019;11(9):202 View
  67. Walker C, Baxter J. Method Sequence and Dominance in Mixed Methods Research: A Case Study of the Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2019;18 View
  68. Kuo K, Talley P, Chang C. The accuracy of machine learning approaches using non-image data for the prediction of COVID-19: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2022;164:104791 View
  69. Holden G, Barker K, Kuppens S, Rosenberg G, LeBreton J. A Replication of Failure, Not a Failure to Replicate. Research on Social Work Practice 2015;25(3):313 View
  70. Delgado‐Quirós L, Aguillo I, Martín‐Martín A, López‐Cózar E, Orduña‐Malea E, Ortega J. Why are these publications missing? Uncovering the reasons behind the exclusion of documents in free‐access scholarly databases. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2024;75(1):43 View
  71. Sabini L, Muzio D, Alderman N. 25 years of ‘sustainable projects’. What we know and what the literature says. International Journal of Project Management 2019;37(6):820 View
  72. Hermawati S, Correa R, Mohan M, Lawson G, Houghton R. Defining human-centricity in Industry 5.0 and assessing the readiness of ergonomics/human factors communities in UK. Ergonomics 2024:1 View
  73. O’Boyle E, Götz M, Zivic D. Gone Fishin’: Addressing Completeness, Accuracy, and Representativeness in the Search and Coding Processes of Meta-Analyses in the Organizational Sciences. Journal of Business and Psychology 2023;38(4):723 View
  74. OBrien P, Arlitsch K, Mixter J, Wheeler J, Sterman L. RAMP – the Repository Analytics and Metrics Portal. Library Hi Tech 2017;35(1):144 View
  75. Bramer W, Giustini D, Kramer B, Anderson P. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 2013;2(1) View
  76. Pimentel J, Arias A, Ramírez D, Molina A, Chomat A, Cockcroft A, Andersson N. Game-Based Learning Interventions to Foster Cross-Cultural Care Training: A Scoping Review. Games for Health Journal 2020;9(3):164 View
  77. Wairimu S, Iwaya L, Fritsch L, Lindskog S. On the Evaluation of Privacy Impact Assessment and Privacy Risk Assessment Methodologies: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access 2024;12:19625 View
  78. Falcone S, Englebienne G, Van Erp J, Heylen D. Toward Standard Guidelines to Design the Sense of Embodiment in Teleoperation Applications: A Review and Toolbox. Human–Computer Interaction 2023;38(5-6):322 View
  79. Sanchez T. Faculty Performance Evaluation Using Citation Analysis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2017;37(1):83 View
  80. Briscoe S, Nunns M, Shaw L. How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross‐sectional sample of Cochrane Reviews. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2020;37(4):293 View
  81. Schäfer M, Löwer M. Ecodesign—A Review of Reviews. Sustainability 2020;13(1):315 View
  82. Katzner T, Pain D, McTee M, Brown L, Cuadros S, Pokras M, Slabe V, Watson R, Wiemeyer G, Bedrosian B, Hampton J, Parish C, Pay J, Saito K, Schulz J. Lead poisoning of raptors: state of the science and cross‐discipline mitigation options for a global problem. Biological Reviews 2024;99(5):1672 View
  83. O'Brien E, Pell C. Debate: Can and should psychiatrists use online information?. BJPsych Bulletin 2015;39(6):312 View
  84. Neumayer C, Rossi L. 15 Years of Protest and Media Technologies Scholarship: A Sociotechnical Timeline. Social Media + Society 2016;2(3) View
  85. Torgerson P, Abdybekova A, Minbaeva G, Shapiyeva Z, Thomas L, Dermauw V, Devleesschauwer B, Gabriël S, Dorny P, Braae U, Saratsis A, Robertson L, Bobić B. Epidemiology of Taenia saginata taeniosis/cysticercosis: a systematic review of the distribution in central and western Asia and the Caucasus. Parasites & Vectors 2019;12(1) View
  86. Cruz A, Paredes H, Martins P. Bird's eye view of augmented reality and applications for education and training: A survey of surveys and reviews. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 2023;31(6):1823 View
  87. Janes J, van der Voort G, Huber D. We know very little about pollination in the Platanthera Rich (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae). Ecology and Evolution 2024;14(4) View
  88. Hanneke R, Young S. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 2017;6(1) View
  89. Sareen S, Mandal S. Challenges of blended learning in higher education across global north-south: A systematic and integrative literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 2024;10:101011 View
  90. Yousafzai A, Sutanto M, Khan M, Yaro N, Baarimah A, Khan N, Memon A, Sani Abubakar A. Systematic Literature Review and Scientometric Analysis on the Advancements in Electrically Conductive Asphalt Technology for Smart and Sustainable Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2024 View
  91. Popescu A, Holman A. Loop and Enjoy: A Scoping Review of the Research on the Effects of Processing Fluency on Aesthetic Reactions to Auditory Stimuli. Psychological Reports 2024 View
  92. Uzunçıbuk H, Tekbaş Atay M. Bibliometric Analysis of In-Vitro Studies in Orthodontics and Aesthetic and Conservative Treatment in the TR Index Journals. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2024;27(3):184 View
  93. Beber B, Lakemann T, Schnars R, Lay J. Employment Effects of Skills Trainings in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials. De Economist 2024 View
  94. Bhatia V, Ebert K, Cannon S, Farhat W, Brown H, Mahoney J, Hilliard M, Penniston K. Call the experts: identifying stakeholders in the long-term care of youth with hypospadias. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2024;12 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Ramsay L, Williamson M. Navigating the Education Research Maze. View
  2. Lane K, Common E, Royer D, Oakes W. Delivering Intensive, Individualized Interventions to Children and Youth with Learning and Behavioral Disabilities. View
  3. Zelený J, Kalabisová J, Stupková L, Melas D, Turnerová L. Management, Tourism and Smart Technologies. View