e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 13 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 9 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Mobile Apps for Vaccination Services: Content Analysis and Quality Assessment
The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts as a simple, objective, and reliable tool for researchers, developers, and health professionals to assess the quality of apps. The scale is widely used for apps for weight management [15], disease [16,17], mental health [18], and pain [19]. In China, mobile terminals consist of two main areas: independent apps and nonindependent apps that rely on social or payment platforms (Alipay applets and We Chat applets).
Online J Public Health Inform 2024;16:e50364
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Characteristics of Zocdoc primary care profiles (N=1455a).
a Bedside rating and wait time rating were missing from 35 profiles; age, race, attractiveness, and medical school were missing from 1-2 profiles.
b DO: doctor of osteopathic medicine.
c MD: doctor of medicine.
Average overall ratings on Zocdoc are typically highly positive with a median of 4.82 (IQR 4.67-4.93).
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e51672
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient-Centered Chronic Wound Care Mobile Apps: Systematic Identification, Analysis, and Assessment
To subjectively assess app quality, the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) [6] was developed, which evaluates engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Additionally, the System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item questionnaire for assessing the usability of a system. It has been effectively applied to evaluate mobile apps related to dementia, depression, pediatric obesity, and smoking cessation [7].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e51592
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review
Between January 2023 and March 2023, three distinct tools were used to evaluate the quality of the chosen apps: an app component matrix developed for this study, the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) [36], and the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (created by the World Wide Web Consortium) [37].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e52996
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Within this domain, attributes of the patient-centered professional emerged to be of major significance for patients utilizing the referred hospital rating website. As a main result, patients felt a decreased sensitivity and a lack of empathy in interpersonal interactions between themselves and the medical staff.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023;10:e39512
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Each of the 22 items was rated as superior (rating +2), adequate (rating +1), not suitable (rating 0), or not applicable. Scores were summed to yield an overall percentage for the website reported as superior (70%-100%), adequate (40%-69%), or not suitable (0%-39%).
Readability tools were used to assess the difficulty of reading the written texts on the websites.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(10):e38641
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Accordingly, the aim of this study was to review current publicly available German IBD apps for patients and physicians and rate their quality using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). MARS was developed in 2015 to objectively assess m Health apps. It has 5 main sections (with subitems), including engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and a subjective section [24].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022;10(5):e31102
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Thus, many of the apps are only rated by the general subjective perception of users with vague rating tools, such as numerical or star-based scores from 1 to 5.
Many attempts have been made to develop effective and practical validation tools to measure the quality of m Health apps. The quality-based concept has been interpreted in different ways according to each author and field, evaluating or resulting in different components [9].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(12):e15433
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Assessing the Quality of Mobile Health-Related Apps: Interrater Reliability Study of Two Guides
In order to overcome the issues health-related apps are facing, some rating scales and guides have been developed (eg, [20,21]). One of the first was the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) [22]. It is one of the most used rating scales to measure the quality of health-related apps [23-27].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(4):e26471
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The German Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS-G): Development and Validation Study
However, the validity and reliability assessment of this rating instrument has not yet been reported, and there is no agreement regarding its application [14].
Baumel and colleagues [15] developed the Evaluation Tool for Mobile and Web-Based e Health Interventions (ENLIGHT), according to a comprehensive systematic review of relevant criteria.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(3):e14479
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS