This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Behavioral Surveillance for Population and Public Health Informatics (41) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (281) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (194) Cross-Sectional Studies in Public Health (203) Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Human Factors (62) Mobile Health and Apps for Maternal and Child Health (127) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (782) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (892)

Published on in Vol 16 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/51601, first published .
Intention to Use Mobile-Based Partograph and Its Predictors Among Obstetric Health Care Providers Working at Public Referral Hospitals in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia in 2022: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Intention to Use Mobile-Based Partograph and Its Predictors Among Obstetric Health Care Providers Working at Public Referral Hospitals in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia in 2022: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Intention to Use Mobile-Based Partograph and Its Predictors Among Obstetric Health Care Providers Working at Public Referral Hospitals in the Oromia Region of Ethiopia in 2022: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Authors of this article:

Kefyalew Naniye Tilahun1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jibril Bashir Adem2 Author Orcid Image ;   Wabi Temesgen Atinafu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Agmasie Damtew Walle3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nebyu Demeke Mengestie4 Author Orcid Image ;   Abraham Yeneneh Birhanu4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    Original Paper

    1College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

    2Department of Public Health, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia

    3Department of Health Informatics, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia

    4Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Corresponding Author:

    Kefyalew Naniye Tilahun, MPH

    College of Medicine and Health Sciences

    Ambo University

    Addis Ababa

    Ambo

    Ethiopia

    Phone: 251 922298660

    Email: kefyalewnaniye64@gmail.com


    Background: A partograph is a pictorial representation of the relationship between cervical dilatation and the time used to diagnose prolonged and obstructed labor. However, the utilization of paper-based partograph is low and it is prone to documentation errors, which can be avoided with the use of electronic partographs. There is only limited information on the proportion of intention to use mobile-based partographs and its predictors.

    Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of obstetric health care providers at public referral hospitals in Oromia, Ethiopia, in 2022 who had the intention to use mobile-based partographs and to determine the predictors of their intention to use mobile-based partographs.

    Methods: We performed an institution-based cross-sectional study from June 1 to July 1, 2022. Census was conducted on 649 participants. A self-administered structured English questionnaire was used, and a 5% pretest was performed. Data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25 for descriptive analysis and AMOS (analysis of moment structure; version 23) for structural and measurement model assessment. Descriptive and structural equation modeling analyses were performed. The hypotheses developed based on a modified Technology Acceptance Model were tested using path coefficients and P values <.05.

    Results: About 65.7% (414/630; 95% CI 61.9%-69.4%) of the participants intended to use mobile-based electronic partographs, with a 97% (630/649) response rate. Perceived usefulness had a positive influence on intention to use (β=.184; P=.02) and attitude (β=.521; P=.002). Perceived ease of use had a positive influence on attitude (β=.382; P=.003), perceived usefulness (β=.503; P=.002), and intention to use (β=.369; P=.001). Job relevance had a positive influence on perceived usefulness (β=.408; P=.001) and intention to use (β=.185; P=.008). Attitude positively influenced intention to use (β=.309; P=.002). Subjective norms did not have a significant influence on perceived usefulness (β=.020; P=.61) and intention to use (β=–.066; P=.07).

    Conclusions: Two-thirds of the obstetric health care providers in our study intended to use mobile-based partographs. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, job relevance, and attitude positively and significantly influenced their intention to use mobile-based electronic partographs. The development of a user-friendly mobile-based partograph that meets job and user expectations can enhance the intention to use.

    Online J Public Health Inform 2024;16:e51601

    doi:10.2196/51601

    Keywords

    mobile-based partograph; mHealth; mobile health; cross-sectional; questionnaire; questionnaires; survey; surveys; modified TAM; technology acceptance model; intention to use; obstetric health care providers; Ethiopia; intent; intention; TAM; experience; experiences; attitude; attitudes; opinion; opinions; perception; perceptions; perspective; perspectives; acceptance; adoption; partograph; digital health; health technology; birth; women's health; obstetrics; obstetric; obstetric health care; labor monitoring 


    Background

    Globally, maternal mortality remains a persistent and potentially preventable issue of great concern. In 2020, every 2 minutes, a woman died due to pregnancy-related preventable causes, indicating that about 800 women died every day, resulting in a maternal mortality ratio of 223 deaths per 100,000 live births [1]. By lessening maternal mortality to roughly 70 per 100,000 live births between 2016 and 2030, the Sustainable Development Goal initiatives hope to avert the maternal mortality rates [2]. Contrary to goals set according to the Sustainable Development Goals 3.1, the global maternal mortality rate increased from 151 in 2019 to 152 per 100,000 live births in 2020 [3]. In Ethiopia, maternal death rate was 412 per 100,000 live births in 2016 [4]. It stayed high, accounting for 412 per 100,000 live births in 2019 [5]. In Ethiopia, prolonged and obstructed labor account for 22% of all maternal deaths [6]. Although prolonged and obstructed labors are among the leading causes of death in resource-poor settings, they can be diagnosed and averted with correct partograph use [7,8]. A partograph is a graphic representation of the labor’s progress that includes pertinent information about the mother and the fetus [9]. In this regard, one of the most important ways in assuring high-quality care for both the mother and the newborn during labor is to use the partograph [10].

    Despite its significance, partograph use by obstetric health care providers is still low in Ethiopia [6,7,11-15]. In addition to this, the paper-based approach is prone to recording errors due to health care providers’ overburdened and retrospective data entry [16]. Paper-based partographs are also exposed to incomplete reporting of parameters. In Uganda, only 24.6% of the partograph parameters demonstrated complete details [17]. In a study in Jigjiga and Degehabur, about 64% of the partograph characteristics were only partially recorded [11]. A study in the West Shoa zone revealed that only 3% of the partographs examined was recorded according to the standard [7]. The rapid progress of technology is one of the many drivers now impacting health care systems [18], and offering health care services via mobile devices is now seen as a promising technological advancement [19]. The widespread availability of smartphones and tablets provides an opportunity for the use of a well-designed electronic partograph [16]. Digitizing the partograph improves adherence and overcomes the limitation of paper-based partographs [10,16,20-22]. The electronic partograph is a contemporary instrument for capturing labor data in real time, which can improve mother and infant outcomes [23]. Electronic partographs make it possible to improve the labor management system’s record of labor progress statistics and care given to mother and fetus, especially in low-income nations [10,20,24,25]. Electronic partographs also result in a significant reduction in the rate of prolonged labor from 42% to 29% and have a far greater usage rate than paper-based partographs [21]. In addition, electronic partographs are preferred over paper-based partographs by clinicians due to their ease of use and less time, improved performance, decreased referral rates, assured prompt referral when necessary, facilitation of reporting obligations, and enhancement of service quality [26,27].

    Studies show that using mobile-based health services in the health sector have the potential to increment health service access, quality, adherence, and efficiency [28-35]. However, the technological benefit obtained depends on the rate of use and adherence of users. Human activities mainly depend on their behavioral intention, and the intention to use digital tools is a determinant factor of actual user behavior. Therefore, determining the behavioral intention to use and its predictors before the adoption of technology is important and prevents implementation failure [36]. Behavioral intention is the degree to which a person has made intentional plans to engage or abstain from engaging in a specific future conduct [37]. To facilitate future implementation, it is vital to ascertain the degree of intention to employ any digital tools in the health sector [36]. A variety of Technology Acceptance Models (TAMs) have been applied to identify and predict end user behavioral intention to utilize technology. Among these, Davis’s TAM is significant and effective at predicting users’ intent to use [38].

    To increase understanding of the factors affecting behavioral intention, different scholars have modified the original TAM [39-45]. Therefore, we modified the TAM to increase the understanding of the predictors that influence the behavioral intention of obstetric health care providers to use mobile-based partographs because information on the proportion of intention to use mobile-based partographs and its predictors is limited. This study was intended to fill this gap.

    Theoretical Model and Hypothesis Development

    TAM is the most well-known methodology for establishing and evaluating each person’s intent to embrace new technology [46]. It is a commonly used model that is used to anticipate possible users’ behavioral intentions to use a technological innovation [47]. TAM had been altered, nevertheless, to boost its capacity for predicting variations in usage intention. Studies on doctors’ approval of digital personal aids in Turkey [48], smart health care services among medical practitioners in China [49], health information system acceptance by hospital personnel in Greece [50], intention to use technology to attend to clients by health professionals in Ghana [51], and sustainable adoption of eHealth systems by health care professionals in Ethiopia [39] by using modified TAM report about 71%,71.5%, 87%, 97%, and 56% of variance in intention to use, respectively.

    TAM was initially established with 2 key dimensions termed as perceived utility and perceived ease of use to identify the potential drivers of intention. The extent to which a person thinks using a given system would improve his or her performance at work is known as perceived usefulness [38]. According to studies [18,38,39,48,52] in health care settings, perceived usefulness had a significant and positive influence on intention to use. Perceived ease of use is another factor that establishes the end users’ behavioral intentions. The degree to which someone perceives a system to be simple to use is known as perceived ease of use [38]. The greater the user’s propensity to use something, the friendlier is the user experience [53]. Perceived ease of use significantly and positively influences intention to use [39,48,50,54] and end users’ attitudes toward using a particular approach or technology [55]. The attitude is described as an individual’s impression of the positive or negative implications of embracing technology [56]. Attitude toward using positively and significantly influences intention to use [52,57,58] and is influenced by perceived usefulness [58,59] and ease of use [39].

    According to the core construct of TAM, it is possible to add antecedents to improve the predictive power and understand the potential factors influencing behavioral intention. To this end, subjective norms and job relevance are important predictors added to the original TAM. Subjective norms refer to “a person’s view that the majority of influential individuals in his life believe he should or should not engage in the behavior in question” [60]. Studies have shown that subjective norms influence perceived usefulness [61] and intention to use [49,62]. The perception of whether a technology is suitable for their jobs can also have an impact on whether they intend to use it. Job relevance examines how users view using the system for work and is found to influence perceived usefulness and intention to use [44,45,63]. Whether the specified concept will mediate the link between constructs is another key factor to consider. The mediators act as a channel for latent concept effects to reach the dependent variables [64]. Perceived usefulness [65,66] and attitude [53,67,68] have been reported to act as mediators in TAM studies. The following hypotheses are formed in light of the information presented above (Figure 1).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Our proposed modified Technology Acceptance Model based on the original Technology Acceptance Model of Davis et al [69].

    Hypothesis 1: Perceived usefulness will have a positive effect on the intention to use mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 2: Perceived usefulness will have a positive effect on obstetric health care providers’ attitudes toward mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 3: Perceived ease of use will have a positive effect on obstetric health care providers’ attitudes toward mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 4: Perceived ease of use will have a positive effect on the perceived usefulness of mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 5: Perceived ease of use will have a positive influence on the intention to use mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 6: Obstetric health care providers’ attitudes toward using mobile-based partographs will positively influence intention to use.

    Hypothesis 7: Job relevance will have a positive effect on the intention to use mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 8: Job relevance will have a positive effect on the perceived usefulness of mobile-based electronic partographs.

    Hypothesis 9: Subjective norms will have a positive effect on the perceived usefulness of mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 10: Subjective norms will have a positive effect on the intention to use mobile-based partographs.

    Hypothesis 11: Perceived usefulness mediates the relationship between job relevance and intention to use.

    Hypothesis 12: Perceived usefulness mediates the relationship between subjective norms and intention to use.

    Hypothesis 13: Perceived usefulness mediates the relationship between perceived ease of use and intention to use.

    Hypothesis 14: Attitude mediates the relationship between perceived usefulness and intention to use.

    Hypothesis 15: Attitude mediates the relationship between perceived ease of use and intention to use.


    Study Design and Setting

    An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1 to July 1, 2022, at public referral hospitals in the Oromia region of Ethiopia. There are 30 municipal administrations and 23 zones in the Oromia region. Thirteen public referral hospitals, 33 general hospitals, 67 primary hospitals, 1383 health centers, and 6797 health posts are located in the Oromia region. In the 13 public referral hospitals, there were about 649 obstetric health care professionals employed. The midwives, nurses, integrated emergency obstetrics and surgery professionals, general practitioners, obstetricians, and gynecologists are trained obstetric health care professionals.

    Study Participants and Sample Size Determination

    All obstetric health care providers who were working at Oromia region public referral hospitals and were available at the time of data collection were the source and study population of this study. The sample size for this study was calculated based on the rule of thumb of structural equation modeling. The most widely used rule of thumb is that for 1 free parameter, 10 observations are required [70,71]. The proposed model of this study had 55 free parameters. Therefore, n (number of free parameters × 10; 55 × 10) = 550, where n represents the sample size. Considering a 10% nonresponse rate, the final minimum sample size was 605.

    Sampling Procedure

    In the 13 public referral hospitals of the Oromia region, there were 649 obstetric health care providers. From the onset, this study required a large sample size to test the developed hypothesis using the maximum likelihood estimator of the structural equation model. However, the number of study participants involved in this study was not adequate for sampling. For this reason, a census was conducted.

    Study Variables

    The outcome variable of this study was the intention to use mobile-based partograph, whereas the mediator variables were attitude toward using and perceived usefulness. The independent variables of this study included technology acceptance–related exogenous latent variables (perceived ease of use, subjective norm, and job relevance), sociodemographic and other related factors of obstetric health care providers (age, sex, marital status, religion, profession, qualification, and years of experience), access to mobile devices, partograph learning, in-service training, and computer courses.

    Operational Definition

    Behavioral intention is the extent to which an individual has made intentional plans to engage in or refrain from engaging in a specific future conduct [37]. The intention to use, in this case, refers to the likelihood of obstetric health care providers whether they intended to use mobile-based partograph if they will be offered. The construct had 4 items, and each was measured with a 5-point Likert scale response. The median score was used as a cutoff point. The obstetric health care provider who scored median and above on intention to use construct was considered as intended to use a mobile-based partograph otherwise unintended.

    Data Collection and Procedure

    A self-administered structured English questionnaire was used to collect data. Regarding the latent variable, the questionnaire was adapted from different literatures [44,53,63,72-77]. The adapted questionnaire was modified to fit the context of this study. The structured questionnaire had 4 parts: the first part included the sociodemographic characteristics of the obstetric health care providers, the second part related to access to mobile devices, the third part related to partograph and computer courses, and the fourth part included technology acceptance–related parameters (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, intention to use, attitude, job relevance, and subjective norm). A total of 21 items were used in this study to test the proposed hypothesis. A Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) was used to rate the level of participant agreement toward the prepared close-ended questions.

    Data Quality Assurance

    A pretest was done on 5% of the sample size among obstetric health care providers who were working out of the study area. One day of training was given to 4 data collectors and 4 supervisors on the objective of the study, data collection procedures, data confidentiality, and respondents’ rights. The data collectors were BSc graduates: 3 midwives, 2 health officers, and 3 nurses. Supervision was continuous and made by the supervisors and principal investigator throughout the data collection. After data collection, completeness was checked.

    Data Processing and Analysis

    Before data analysis, the coded data were entered into EpiData (version 4.6) and finally exported into SPSS (version 25; IBM Corp) for descriptive analysis and AMOS (analysis of moment structure; version 23) for structural and measurement model assessment. Structural equation modeling is a multivariate statistical analysis technique that is used to analyze structural relationships. The data set was checked for missing values, and there were no missing data. The sociodemographic data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS, and the results were presented using a frequency table. Descriptive statistics was used to compute the proportion of intention to use mobile-based partographs, and the result was presented using the bar graph. The maximum likelihood estimation method was considered, and the assumption was checked. One assumption is the presence of multiple measurements for a construct. Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and intention to use each have 4 items. However, attitude, subjective norms, and job relevance each have 3 items. Multicollinearity among the independent variables was assessed using the variance inflation factor. The result obtained (variance inflation factor ranged from 1.6 to 2.027) proved that there was no multicollinearity among independent variables.

    Another assumption was univariate normality, which was assessed using kurtosis and skewness values, and the result shows there was univariate normality. The kurtosis value of less than 5, a critical ratio between –1.96 and +1.96, was used to declare the presence of multivariate normality. Unfortunately, the assumption of multivariate normality was not fulfilled. Therefore, bootstrapping technique was used to manage multivariate nonnormality.

    Confirmatory factor analysis was used to perform measurement model assessment. Construct reliability was tested using Cronbach α and composite reliability. A cutoff point greater than .7 was used to declare the presence of internal consistency of the item that measured construct [78]. The recommended Cronbach α value should be .7 and above [79,80]. Furthermore, the composite reliability should be greater than .7 [36]. The average variance extracted and factor loading was used to measure convergent validity. In the measurement model assessment, the average variance extracted value greater than 0.50 [45,64] and factor loading of at least 0.6 [75] should be used to establish convergent validity. Discriminant validity assesses the distinctness of construct when measured by their respective items. The discriminant validity was determined using the square root of average variance extracted, and the value should be greater than the interconstruct correlations to declare whether the discriminant validity of the construct was achieved [64]. The degree to which one construct differs from every other construct in the instrument is indicated by its discriminant validity [81].

    Model goodness of fit was checked both for measurement and structural model assessment. A model fit index of the ratio of chi-square to degrees of freedom ≤3 [36], comparative fit index >0.90, goodness-of-fit index >0.90, adjusted goodness-of-fit index >0.85, normalized fit index >0.90, standardized root mean square residual <0.08, and root means square error of approximation <0.008 index value were used to measure and declare the model’s goodness of fit [39,50]. We planned to perform model modification to improve the model fitness if the initial model did not fit by deleting the factor loading value with<0.5 covariate error terms [82]. In this regard, even if the measurement model fitness was achieved initially, the model modification was performed since the chi-square to the degree of freedom for the structural model was 3.128. Therefore, to increase the model fitness, we covariate the error term 15 and 16 on the intention to use the latent variable. Finally, the overall model fitted the data well.

    After measurement model assessment, structural model fitness was checked and the model fit the data well. Then, the structural model assessment was performed. Based on AMOS output, the standardized path coefficient and the level of significance were used to test the developed hypothesis and determine the association between the latent variables of the study. The standardized regression weights showed the strength of association between latent variables [83], and P values less than .05 showed the level of significance considered. The square multiple correlations were used to report the proportion of variances in endogenous latent variables explained by exogenous variables. The bootstrap method was used to test the mediation effect.

    Ethics Approval

    Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Gondar, and this study was approved by its ethics review board (Ref/IPH/2129/2014). A letter of support was obtained from the Department of Health Informatics, and written consent was taken from each study participant.


    Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Participants

    A total of 649 participants were planned to be included in this study from all public referral hospitals in the Oromia region for the assessment of their intention to use mobile-based partographs and the predictors for their intention to use. Among them, 97% (630/649) gave their consent and completed the questionnaire. The results of this study show that almost more than half (344/630, 54.6%) of the study participants were males, while 45.4% (286/630) of the participants were females. The median age of the study participants was 32 (IQR 9) years. The majority of the participants were in the age group of 30-39 years. About 34.4% (217/630) of the respondents were Orthodox Christians in religion. Among the study participants, 371 (58.9%) respondents were married and 218 (36.4%) were single. Regarding their profession, more than half (351/630, 55.7%) were midwives, 96 (15.2%) were nurses, and 95 (15.1%) were general practitioners. Of the total study participants, 497 (78.9%) were bachelor’s degree holders and 78 (12.5%) were a specialist in their qualifications. Almost half (328/630, 52.1%) of the study participants had ≤4 years of working experience with the qualification they had. All the sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the obstetric health care providers who were working at public referral hospitals in the Oromia region of Ethiopia in 2022 (N=630).
    Demographic characteristicsValues, n (%)
    Sex

    		Male344 (54.6)

    		Female286 (45.4)
    Age (years)

    		20-29232 (36.8)

    		30-39299 (47.5)

    		>4099 (15.7)
    Religion

    		Orthodox Christian217 (34.4)

    		Muslim167 (26.5)

    		Protestant208 (33)

    		Othersa38 (6)
    Marital status

    		Married371 (58.9)

    		Single218 (34.6)

    		Divorced25 (4)

    		Separated10 (1.6)

    		Widowed2 (0.3)

    		Othersb4 (0.6)
    Profession

    		Midwives351 (55.7)

    		Nurses96 (15.2)

    		General Practitioner95 (15.1)

    		Obstetrician and Gynecologist78 (12.4)

    		Othersc10 (1.6)
    Level of qualification

    		Bachelors497 (78.9)

    		Masters48 (7.6)

    		Specialists79 (12.5)

    		Othersd6 (1)
    Years of working experience

    		≤4328 (52)

    		5-9195 (31)

    		≥10107 (17)

    aWaaqeffanna, Adventist, and Catholic.

    bIn a relationship.

    cIntegrated Emergency Obstetric Surgery professionals.

    dDiploma.

    Access to Mobile Devices and Partographs

    In this study, of the 630 participants, 625 (99.2%) had access to mobile devices (Table 2). Approximately 93.1% (582/630) of the obstetric health care providers had access to a smartphone. About 77.8% (490/630) of the study participants had a partograph. However, only 326 (51.7%) study participants had taken in-service training for using paper-based partographs. Regarding the computer course, 310 (80.7%) took basic computer training. Table 2 shows the frequency of access to mobile devices, partograph learning, partograph in-service training, and computer courses.

    Table 2. Access to mobile devices, partograph training, and computer courses by obstetric health care providers who were working at the public referral hospitals in the Oromia region of Ethiopia in 2022 (N=630).
    VariablesValues, n (%)
    Access to mobile devices

    		Yes625 (99.2)

    		No5 (0.8)
    Mobile device type

    		Smartphone582 (93.1)

    		Tablet33 (5.3)

    		Othersa10 (1.6)
    Study partograph

    		Yes490 (77.8)

    		No140 (22.2)
    In-service training on paper-based partograph

    		Yes326 (51.7)

    		No304 (48.3)
    Computer courses

    		Yes384 (61)

    		No246 (39)
    Computer course level

    		Basic course310 (80.7)

    		Advanced training74 (19.3)

    aBasic phones or feature phone.

    Intention to Use Mobile-Based Partographs

    Among the 630 obstetric health care providers, 414 had intention to use mobile-based partographs. Thus, about 65.7% (414/630; 95% CI 61.9%-69.4%) or two-thirds of the study participants scored median and above of intention to use. The median score of intention to use mobile-based partograph was 16 (IQR 1.5). The minimum and maximum scores for intention to use were 4 and 20, respectively. Figure S1 of Multimedia Appendix 1 shows the proportion of intended and unintended use of mobile-based electronic partographs among obstetric health care providers who were working at public referral hospitals in the Oromia region in 2022. In this study, Cronbach α and composite reliability values were greater than .9. All the factor loading values were found in the range of 0.843 to 0.946, and the average variance extracted value was found in the range of 0.761 to 0.840. Hence, construct reliability and convergent validity of the measurement model were achieved.

    Discriminant Validity

    The finding of this study indicates that the square root of the average variance extracted value was greater than the value of the interconstruct correlations. Therefore, the discriminant validity of the measurement model was achieved. Table S2 of Multimedia Appendix 1 demonstrates the discriminant validity of the model. The bold values in the table represent the square root of the average variance extracted.

    Measurement Indices of the Goodness of Fit of Model

    In this study, all the obtained values of the measurement model fit indices were in an acceptable range. Hence, the result of this study indicated that the modified proposed model fitted the data well. Table 3 shows the result of model fit indices [36,39,50].

    Table 3. Results of the indices of goodness of fit of the measurement model assessment.
    Model fit indices, citationCutoff pointResult obtainedaFit decision
    Chi-square to degree of freedom [36]≤32.245Accepted
    Goodness-of-fit index [50]>0.90.945Accepted
    Adjusted goodness-of-fit index [50]>0.850.927Accepted
    Normed fit index [50]>0.90.974Accepted
    Comparative fit index [39,50]>0.90.985Accepted
    Root mean square residuals [39,50]<0.080.022Accepted
    Root mean square error of approximation [50]<0.080.044Accepted

    aThe result is obtained from the measurement model assessment using AMOS (analysis of moment structure; version 23) software to check model fitness.

    Structural Model Assessment

    Among the 10 proposed hypotheses of the direct relationship, 8 were supported by the collected data. However, hypothesis 9 and hypothesis 10 failed to support the proposed hypothesis. Our study shows that perceived usefulness positively influences intention to use (β=.184; P=.02). In addition, perceived usefulness had a positive influence on attitude (β=.512; P=.002). According to our finding, perceived ease of use positively influenced attitude (β=.382; P=.003), perceived usefulness (β=.503; P=.002), and intention to use (β=.369; P=.001). Perceived ease of use had the strongest path coefficient in influencing intention to use mobile-based partographs.

    Job relevance in the structural model had a positive and significant influence (β=.408; P=.002) on perceived usefulness. In addition, job relevance (β=.185; P=.008) positively and significantly influenced the intention to use. The results of this study also indicated that attitude (β=.309; P=.002) positively and significantly influenced intention to use.

    Subjective norms had insignificant influences on perceived usefulness (β=.02; P=.61) and intention to use (β=–.066; P=.07). Therefore, hypotheses 9 and 10 failed to support the developed hypothesis. Perceived ease of use, attitude, and job relevance had a 0.369, 0.309, and 0.185 path coefficient in association with intention to use, respectively. Results from the AMOS output of the proposed model showed that perceived usefulness was influenced by both job relevance and perceived ease of use (Figure 2). However, perceived ease of use (β=.503) had higher path coefficient than job relevance (β=.408) in influencing perceived usefulness. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use influenced the attitude toward using electronic partographs. Perceived usefulness (β=.521) had a higher path coefficient than perceived ease of use (β=.382) in influencing attitude toward using electronic partographs. Table 4 shows the results of the hypothesis testing of the direct path analysis of the proposed model.

    ‎
    Figure 2. AMOS (analysis of moment structure; version 23) output of the standardized estimate. AT: attitude; ITU: intention to use; JR: job relevance; PEOU: perceived ease of use; PU: perceived usefulness; SN: subjective norms.
    Table 4. The results of the hypothesis testing of the proposed model.
    HypothesisCausal pathβ (path coefficient)Critical ratioP valueDecision
    1ITUa←PUb.1843.294.02Supported
    2ATc←PU.5219.918.002Supported
    3AT←PEOUd.3827.279.003Supported
    4PU←PEOU.50311.097.002Supported
    5ITU←PEOU.3697.160.001Supported
    6ITU←AT.3096.351.002Supported
    7ITU←JRe.1853.969.008Supported
    8PU←JR.4088.476.002Supported
    9PU←SNf.0200.540.61Not supported
    10ITU←SN–.066–2.060.07Not supported

    aITU: intention to use.

    bPU: perceived usefulness.

    cAT: attitude.

    dPEOU: perceived ease of use.

    eJR: job relevance.

    fSN: subjective norms.

    Among the 15 developed hypotheses, 5 of them deal with the mediation effect of perceived usefulness and attitude between the exogenous latent variables and outcome variable in this study. Table S3 of Multimedia Appendix 1 shows the result of the mediation analysis using the bootstrapping method. The 95% biased confidence interval and P value level were used to test the presence of a mediation. Our results showed that perceived usefulness partially mediates between job relevance and intention to use. Hence, hypothesis 11 was supported. However, perceived usefulness did not mediate the relationship between subjective norms and intention to use. Therefore, hypothesis 12 was not supported. However, perceived usefulness partially mediated perceived ease of use and intention to use. Therefore, hypothesis 13 was supported. Furthermore, attitude partially mediated the relationship between perceived usefulness and intention to use as well as perceived ease of use and intention to use. Consequently, hypothesis 14 and hypothesis 15 were supported. Table S3 of Multimedia Appendix 1 illustrates the result of the mediation analysis.

    The squared multiple correlations indicate the predictive power of the model. In this study, the proposed model explained 85% of the variance in intention to use a mobile-based partograph. Perceived ease of use and job relevance aggregately explained 77% of the variance in perceived usefulness. However, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness explained about 75% of the variance in attitude toward use. Table S4 of Multimedia Appendix 1 shows the result of the predictive power of the proposed model.


    Principal Findings

    This study examines the proportion of obstetric health care providers in the Oromia region of Ethiopia who had the intention to use mobile-based partographs and the predictors for their intention to use. The result of our study revealed that about two-thirds (414/630, 65.7%) of the obstetric health care providers had the intention to use mobile-based partographs. Even if no similar study was conducted on the intention to use a mobile-based partograph, ascertaining the end user’s level of acceptance to use technology before execution serves as a prerequisite to judging the accomplishment of the execution [39]. In this regard, a study in north Gondar reported that 44% of the obstetric health care providers were willing to use mobile-based partographs [84]. The findings of [84] assist our study in promoting the execution of mobile-based partographs in clinical settings for enhancing the care given during the management of labor.

    The results of our study regarding TAM were in line with those of the original TAM [69]. In this study, perceived ease of use (β=.503; P=.002) significantly and positively influenced the perceived usefulness of mobile-based partographs by obstetric health care providers. This study’s finding is in line with a study in Omaha on telemedicine acceptance (β=.56) [18] and that in Ethiopia on eHealth acceptance (β=.385) [39]. Further, this study finding is supported by a study conducted in Tanzania in which skilled birth attendants found that electronic partograph was useful, easy to use, and improved the quality of care [24]. This indicates that obstetric health care providers who perceive that mobile-based partograph is easy to use, easy to interact with, and easy to learn are more likely to perceive it as useful, and consequently, this will lead to a high intention to use it [39].

    Another association in this study was that perceived usefulness (β=.184; P=.02) positively influenced intention to use. This positive and significant relationship of the construct is in agreement with a study in Turkey on personal digital assistant acceptance (β=.41) [48], a study in Uganda on mobile phone adoption in maternal health care (β=.186) [54], and a study in Ethiopia on eHealth adoption (β=.387) [39]. Thus, obstetric health care providers’ perception of mobile-based partograph usefulness is a valuable predictor of behavioral intention to use. It is important to find out how users measure the usefulness of the technology because the more the obstetric health care providers perceive that a mobile-based partograph improves productivity, performance, and effectiveness, and decreases the duration of recording, the more likely they will intend to use it. Our study shows that perceived ease of use positively (β=.382) and significantly (P=.003) influenced attitude toward using electronic partographs. This direct effect of perceived ease of use on attitude is in line with a study in Ethiopia (β=.347) [39]. These findings indicate that if users perceive that the use of electronic partograph is easy, they will develop a positive attitude toward using it, consequently impacting their behavioral intention to use it.

    We found that perceived ease of use of mobile-based partographs significantly affected intention to use (β=.369; P=.001). This showed that the likelihood of intention to use the mobile-based partograph will increase with an increase in the impression of ease of use. This outcome is consistent with a study on the adoption of health information systems that was conducted in Greece (β=.29) [50] and in Ethiopia (β=.339) [39], demonstrating that requiring less effort will boost the system’s ability to influence people’s intentions to use eHealth systems. Perceived ease of use in this study had the highest path coefficient and a significant impact on usage intention. The more obstetric health care professionals are intentional to use the mobile-based partograph, the less effort it is thought to take to operate it on both a mental and physical level. To meet user expectations, electronic partograph developers should concentrate on the device’s user-friendliness. This might increase the uptake and ongoing use of mobile-based partographs. Additionally, we found that attitudes about adopting mobile-based partographs are influenced by perceived usefulness (β=.521; P=.002). This finding is consistent with studies on telemedicine acceptability done in China (β=.43) [85] and Ethiopia (β=.26) [39]. The obstetric health care providers’ attitude toward use was impacted by how much they believed this technology improves performance and productivity in their job. Thus, intention to use is directly influenced by attitude toward use (β=.309; P=.002). Our study’s conclusion is consistent with that in a study on the intention of health professionals in Ethiopia to use eHealth (β=.526) and indicates that actions that improve perspectives, such as ongoing training and support and information sharing on eHealth innovations, should be prioritized heavily [39]. The more positive perception the obstetric health care providers developed and had, the higher they intended to use eHealth.

    In this study, job relevance significantly and positively (β=.408; P=.002) influenced perceived usefulness. This study path relationship is in line with a study that focused on the adoption of technology using modified TAM [44,86]. There should be adequate information provision strategies for end users about the applicability and usefulness of mobile-based partographs in labor management. A study on personal digital assistant acceptance by health care professionals supports this evidence in a way that information provision about the technology applicability by health care institutions promotes technology acceptance [80]. Additionally, job relevance significantly influenced intention to use (β=.185; P=.008). This finding is in line with a study conducted on health information technology acceptance [44]. This means that the more probable obstetric health care professionals expected to use a mobile-based partograph, the more they believed it was appropriate, relevant, and vital to their work. Because of this, it is crucial to let obstetric health care professionals know about the use of mobile-based partographs in labor management.

    According to this study, subjective norms had an insignificant impact on perceived usefulness (β=.020; P=.61). This insignificant influence is in line with the findings of a study on hospital information systems (β=–.18; P>.05) [87]. This might be because obstetric health care professionals are more likely to establish their independent judgments and may therefore pay less heed to what other people think. Another factor is that regardless of what is important, others may think all obstetric health care providers will be forced to use mobile-based partographs as long as the government mandates their usage in health care facilities for labor management. Subjective norms also insignificantly influence intention to use (β=–.066; P=.07). The result of this study is inconsistent with those of other studies [34,62,75]. Because of the time-consuming and detailed recording in paper-based partographs, obstetric health care providers could record incorrect and incomplete data and they could perform retrograde documentation to avoid accountability. However, in case of the digital partographs, retrograde documentation is not allowed and accountability is assured. To affect the belief that most significant others consider he or she should utilize the mobile-based partograph, the health care system should strengthen the concept of teamwork.

    In contrast to a study on the adoption of eHealth in the Amhara region, where attitude was the strongest predictor of intention, in this study, perceived ease of use was the strongest predictor of intention to use [39]. To maximize the likelihood of initial and ongoing usage, mobile-based partographs should be provided with an easy function. The association between job relevance and intention to use as well as the relationship between perceived ease of use and intention to use is partially mediated by perceived usefulness in the study’s proposed model, which is consistent with [88]. However, perceived utility is unable to buffer the link between subjective norms and usage intention.

    Perceived ease of use and intention to use were partially mediated by attitude and consistent with the study conducted using modified TAM [83]. Attitude toward using mediates the relationship between perceived usefulness and intention to use. To maximize the benefits of the additional capabilities, makers of eHealth platforms should actively work to change how physicians feel about using them [68]. The proposed modified TAM explained about 85% variance in the obstetric health care providers’ intention to use mobile-based partographs. This shows that the model’s overall predictive ability was high, and the variance in this study was almost equivalent to a study [50] utilizing modified TAM in a health care scenario.

    Limitations of This Study

    First, it is difficult to discuss whether the proportion of intention to use mobile-based partographs among obstetric health care providers is high or low due to the lack of similar previous studies. This study was a one-time study. Second, it is difficult to establish a cause-effect relationship in this study due to the cross-sectional nature of this study. Third, as the respondents were only from the government and tertiary care levels, caution must be exercised when applying these findings to all obstetric health care providers in the area.

    Conclusion

    In our study, two-thirds of the obstetric health care providers had the intention to use mobile-based partographs. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, job relevance, and attitude positively and significantly influenced their intention to use mobile-based electronic partographs. Among these, perceived ease of use was the strongest potential predictor of intention to use. The connection between exogenous latent variables and intention to use was partially mediated by perceived usefulness and attitude toward usage, except for subjective norms. The modified TAM is an effective model for forecasting the intention of an obstetric health care professional to use a mobile-based partograph.

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank the University of Gondar for granting us the ethics approval to conduct this thesis. We are very grateful to Oromia referral hospital management, data collectors, supervisors, and participants of this study. KNT is immensely grateful for the support and care of his family and colleagues during his thesis work. All authors declared that they had insufficient or no funding to support open access publication of this manuscript, including from affiliated organizations or institutions, funding agencies, or other organizations. JMIR Publications provided article processing fee (APF) support for the publication of this article.

    Data Availability

    The data set used for the analysis in this study can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

    Authors' Contributions

    All the authors of this study contributed to problem identification, proposal development, data collection and analysis, and thesis write-up to final approval for publication. They accept responsibility for this study.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Supplementary data.

    DOCX File , 226 KB
    1. Khalil A, Samara A, O'Brien P, Coutinho CM, Quintana SM, Ladhani SN. A call to action: the global failure to effectively tackle maternal mortality rates. The Lancet Global Health. Aug 12, 2023;11(8):e1165-e1167. [CrossRef]
    2. Strong K, Noor A, Aponte J, Banerjee A, Cibulskis R, Diaz T, et al. Monitoring the status of selected health related sustainable development goals: methods and projections to 2030. Glob Health Action. Dec 31, 2020;13(1):1846903-1846904. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Global progress and projections for maternal mortality 2021. Gates Foundation. URL: https:/​/www.​gatesfoundation.org/​goalkeepers/​report/​2021-report/​progress-indicators/​maternal-mortality/​#:~:text=In%202020%2C%20the%20global%20maternal,nearly%20double%20the%20SDG%20target [accessed 2022-05-16]
    4. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2016. DHS Program. URL: https://ojphi.jmir.org/citations/parse/51601/904765/2 [accessed 2024-04-25]
    5. Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey 2019. DHS Program. URL: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR363/FR363.pdf [accessed 2024-04-25]
    6. Hailu T, Nigus K, Gidey G, Hailu B, Moges Y. Assessment of partograph utilization and associated factors among obstetric care givers at public health institutions in central zone, Tigray, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. Oct 10, 2018;11(1):710-712. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Bedada KE, Huluka TK, Bulto GA, EphremYohannesRoga. Low utilization of partograph and its associated factors among obstetric care providers in governmental health facilities at West Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia. Int J Reprod Med. May 23, 2020.:3738673-3738677. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Ojong I. Knowledge and utilization of partograph in labor monitoring among nurses and midwives in a tertiary health facility in South-South Nigeria. African Journal of Biomedical Research. Feb 22, 2021. URL: https://ojshostng.com/index.php/ajbr/article/view/75 [accessed 2024-04-25]
    9. Ayenew AA, Zewdu BF. Partograph utilization as a decision-making tool and associated factors among obstetric care providers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. Nov 03, 2020;9(1):251. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Begum F, Tanvir MSH, Hasan MJ. Advantages of “life curve” mobile application: an easier alternate of paper partograph. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol. Jul 19, 2020;32(2):84-89. [CrossRef]
    11. Ayehubizu LM, Tibebeu AT, Fetene MT, Yohannes SH, Yadita ZS. Partograph utilization and associated factors among obstetric care givers in governmental health institutions of Jigjiga and Degehabur towns, Somali region, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Partograph utilization and associated factors. Sep 14, 2022;17(3):e0264373-e0264376. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Bekele D, Beyene K, Hinkosa L, et al. Partograph utilization and associated factors among graduating health professional students in Asella Referal and Teaching Hospital. Research & Reviews: Journal of Computational Biology. URL: https:/​/www.​academia.edu/​37187248/​Partograph_Utilization_and_Associated_Factors_among_Graduating_Health_Professional_ Students_in_Asella_Referal_and_Teaching_Hospital_Ethiopia_2016 [accessed 2024-04-25]
    13. Wakgari N, Amano A, Berta M, Tessema G. Partograph utilization and associated factors among obstetric care providers in North Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Afr Health Sci. Jun 11, 2015;15(2):552-559. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Hagos AA, Teka EC, Degu G. Utilization of partograph and its associated factors among midwives working in public health institutions, Addis Ababa City Administration, Ethiopia, 2017. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Jan 21, 2020;20(1):49. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Amin E, Nyiawung F, Fondungallah J, Egbe T. The partogram: knowledge, attitude and use by healthcare providers at two hospitals in the South West Region of Cameroon. Arch Community Med Public Health. Oct 29, 2018;4(2):073-077. [CrossRef]
    16. Singh S, Khalid A, Paul K, Haider Y, Prasad S. prasavGraph: an Android-based e-partograph. 2016. Presented at: International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology (ICSMB); 2016; Kharagpur, India. [CrossRef]
    17. Mukisa J, Grant I, Magala J, Ssemata AS, Lumala PZ, Byamugisha J. Level of partograph completion and healthcare workers' perspectives on its use in Mulago National Referral and teaching hospital, Kampala, Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res. Feb 07, 2019;19(1):107-109. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Kissi J, Dai B, Dogbe CS, Banahene J, Ernest O. Predictive factors of physicians' satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance. Health Informatics J. Sep 21, 2020;26(3):1866-1880. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Sezgin E, Yıldırım. A literature review on attitudes of health professionals towards health information systems: from e-Health to m-Health. Procedia Technology. May 07, 2014;16:1317-1326. [CrossRef]
    20. Wahyuni S, Nuryuniarti R, Nurmahmudah E. A design of partograph mobile with Android based to monitoring childbirth process. J Phy Conf Series. Jul 01, 2019;1179(1):12157-12158. [CrossRef]
    21. Rahman A, Begum T, Ashraf F, Akhter S, Hoque DME, Ghosh TK, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of electronic vs. paper partograph on improving birth outcomes: A prospective crossover study design. PLoS One. Nov 23, 2019;14(10):e0222314-e0222317. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Schweers J, Khalid M, Underwood H, Bishnoi S, Chhugani M. mLabour: design and evaluation of a mobile partograph and labor ward management application. Procedia Engineering. May 16, 2016;159:35-43. [CrossRef]
    23. Jain S, Kumar P, Jain M, Bathla M, Joshi S, Srivastava S, et al. Increasing adherence to plotting e-partograph: a quality improvement project in a rural maternity hospital in India. BMJ Open Qual. Aug 03, 2021;10(Suppl 1):e001404-e001405. [CrossRef]
    24. Litwin LE, Maly C, Khamis AR, Hiner C, Zoungrana J, Mohamed K, et al. Use of an electronic Partograph: feasibility and acceptability study in Zanzibar, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. May 09, 2018;18(1):147-149. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Sanghvi H, Mohan D, Litwin L, Bazant E, Gomez P, MacDowell T, et al. Effectiveness of an electronic partogram: a mixed-method, quasi-experimental study among skilled birth attendants in Kenya. Glob Health Sci Pract. Dec 23, 2019;7(4):521-539. [CrossRef]
    26. Sarojini VL, Sarojini, Anagondanahalli P, Prakash, Suchitra. Study to compare between paperless partogram and modified who partogram in management of labour. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. Dec 25, 2017;7(1):99-100. [CrossRef]
    27. Usmanova G, Gresh A, Cohen MA, Kim Y, Srivastava A, Joshi CS, et al. Acceptability and barriers to use of the ASMAN provider-facing electronic platform for peripartum care in public facilities in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, India: A qualitative study using the Technology Acceptance Model-3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Nov 11, 2020;17(22):8333-8334. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Jemere AT, Yeneneh YE, Tilahun B, Fritz F, Alemu S, Kebede M. Access to mobile phone and willingness to receive mHealth services among patients with diabetes in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. Jan 24, 2019;9(1):e021766-e021767. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Senay B, Gashu KD, Jemere AT, Mekonnen ZA. Epileptic patients' willingness to receive cell-phone based medication reminder in Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Jun 24, 2019;19(1):109-110. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Kasie M, Guadie H, Gashu K. Mobile phone-based teleconsultation service utilization and associated factors among healthcare professionals in primary hospitals of West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Preprint posted online on June 17, 2021. [CrossRef]
    31. Mekonnen ZA, Gelaye KA, Were MC, Tilahun B. Mothers intention and preference to use mobile phone text message reminders for child vaccination in Northwest Ethiopia. BMJ Health Care Inform. Feb 19, 2021;28(1):e100193-e100194. [CrossRef]
    32. Andre N, Wibawanti R, Siswanto BB. Mobile phone-based intervention in hypertension management. Int J Hypertens. Nov 11, 2019.:9021017-9021018. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Kang H, Park H. A mobile app for hypertension management based on clinical practice guidelines: development and deployment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Feb 02, 2016;4(1):e12-e13. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Guo X, Yuan J, Cao X, Chen X, editors. Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: A service participants analysis. 2012. Presented at: 2012 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering; September 20-22; Dallas, TX, USA. [CrossRef]
    35. Deng Z. Understanding public users' adoption of mobile health service. IJMC. Jun 24, 2013;11(4):351-352. [CrossRef]
    36. Ahmed MH, Bogale AD, Tilahun B, Kalayou MH, Klein J, Mengiste SA, et al. Intention to use electronic medical record and its predictors among health care providers at referral hospitals, north-West Ethiopia, 2019: using unified theory of acceptance and use technology 2(UTAUT2) model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Sep 03, 2020;20(1):207-208. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Seethamraju R, Diatha KS, Garg S. Intention to use a mobile-based information technology solution for tuberculosis treatment monitoring – applying a UTAUT model. Inf Syst Front. Sep 18, 2017;20(1):163-181. [CrossRef]
    38. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. Sep 16, 1989;13(3):319-320. [CrossRef]
    39. Kalayou MH, Endehabtu BF, Tilahun B. The applicability of the modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on the sustainable adoption of eHealth systems in resource-limited settings. JMDH. Dec 14, 2020;Volume 13:1827-1837. [CrossRef]
    40. Alanazi MH, Soh B. Behavioral intention to use IoT technology in healthcare settings. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res. Oct 09, 2019;9(5):4769-4774. [CrossRef]
    41. Bennani A, Oumlil R. Do constructs of Technology Acceptance Model predict the ICT appropriation by physicians and nurses in healthcare public centers in Agadir, South of Morocco. 2010. Presented at: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Health Informatics BIOSTEC; January 20-23;9-10; Valencia, Spain. [CrossRef]
    42. Khan I, Xitong G, Ahmad Z, Shahzad F. Investigating factors impelling the adoption of e-health: a perspective of African expats in China. SAGE Open. Jul 23, 2019;9(3):215824401986580-215824421582441. [CrossRef]
    43. Almojaibel AA, Munk N, Goodfellow LT, Fisher TF, Miller KK, Comer AR, et al. Health care practitioners' determinants of telerehabilitation acceptance. Int J Telerehabil. Jun 30, 2020;12(1):43-50. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Ketikidis P, Dimitrovski T, Lazuras L, Bath PA. Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: an application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics J. Jun 09, 2012;18(2):124-134. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Brar PS, Shah B, Singh J, Ali F, Kwak D. Using modified Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the adoption of a proposed IoT-based indoor disaster management software tool by rescue workers. Sensors (Basel). Feb 26, 2022;22(5):1866-1867. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. To AT, Trinh THM. Understanding behavioral intention to use mobile wallets in Vietnam: Extending the TAM with trust and enjoyment. Cogent Business & Management. Mar 12, 2021;8(1):1891661-1891662. [CrossRef]
    47. Chiou Y. Perceived usefulness, perceive ease of use, computer attitude, and using experience of Web 2.0 applications as predictors of intent to use Web 2.0 by pre-service teachers for teaching. Ohio University. Mar 13, 2011. URL: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/etd/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=ohiou1303314743 [accessed 2024-04-25]
    48. Basak E, Gumussoy CA, Calisir F. Examining the factors affecting PDA acceptance among physicians: an extended Technology Acceptance Model. J Healthc Eng. Jan 05, 2015;6(3):399-418. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Pan J, Ding S, Wu D, Yang S, Yang J. Exploring behavioural intentions toward smart healthcare services among medical practitioners: a technology transfer perspective. International Journal of Production Research. Nov 29, 2018;57(18):5801-5820. [CrossRef]
    50. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int J Med Inform. Feb 09, 2009;78(2):115-126. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Boadu RO, Lamptey MA, Boadu KAO, Adzakpah G, Mensah NK. Healthcare providers' intention to use technology to attend to clients in Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Biomed Res Int. Feb 01, 2021;2021:5547544-5547545. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Zayyad M, Toycan M. Factors affecting sustainable adoption of e-health technology in developing countries: an exploratory survey of Nigerian hospitals from the perspective of healthcare professionals. PeerJ. Aug 01, 2018;6:e4436-e4437. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Bondzie‐Micah V, Qigui S, Arkorful VE, Lugu BK, Bentum‐Micah G, Ayi‐Bonte ANA. Predicting consumer intention to use electronic health service: An empirical structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Public Affairs. Mar 25, 2021;22(4):e2677-e2678. [CrossRef]
    54. Byomire G, Maiga G. A model for mobile phone adoption in maternal healthcare. A model for mobile phone adoption in maternal healthcare. Jul 17, 2015;2015:1-2. [CrossRef]
    55. Davis F. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Nov 15, 1985. URL: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192 [accessed 2024-04-25]
    56. Orruño E, Gagnon MP, Asua J, Ben Abdeljelil A. Evaluation of teledermatology adoption by health-care professionals using a modified Technology Acceptance Model. J Telemed Telecare. Jul 27, 2011;17(6):303-304. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Abushaar L, Ismail A. Acceptance of teleconsultation among doctors and the determinant factors in teaching hospital in Malaysia. 2017. Presented at: 2nd Public Health International Conference (PHICo); December; Malaysia. [CrossRef]
    58. Chen J, Park Y, Putzer G. An examination of the components that increase acceptance of smartphones among healthcare professionals. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics. Mar 12, 2010;5(2):16-17. [CrossRef]
    59. Djamasbi S, Fruhling A, Loiacono E. The influence of affect, attitude and usefulness in the acceptance of telemedicine systems. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA). May 23, 2009. URL: https:/​/digitalcommons.​unomaha.edu/​cgi/​viewcontent.​cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1026&context=isqafacpub [accessed 2024-04-25]
    60. Fishbein M. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley; Jul 05, 1975.
    61. Pai RR, Alathur S. Determinants of individuals’ intention to use mobile health: insights from India. TG. Aug 08, 2019;13(3/4):306-326. [CrossRef]
    62. Helia VN, Asri VI, Kusrini E, Miranda S. Modified technology acceptance model for hospital information system evaluation – a case study. MATEC Web Conf. Feb 28, 2018;154:04-05. [CrossRef]
    63. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science. Feb 02, 2000;46(2):186-204. [CrossRef]
    64. Zhou M, Zhao L, Kong N, Campy KS, Qu S, Wang S. Factors influencing behavior intentions to telehealth by Chinese elderly: An extended TAM model. Int J Med Inform. Jun 08, 2019;126:118-127. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Moslehpour M, Pham V, Wong W, Bilgiçli. e-Purchase intention of Taiwanese consumers: sustainable mediation of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Sustainability. Jan 17, 2018;10(1):234-235. [CrossRef]
    66. Alsajjan B, Dennis C. Internet banking acceptance model: Cross-market examination. Journal of Business Research. Sep 11, 2010;63(9-10):957-963. [CrossRef]
    67. Zaremohzzabieh Z, Samah BA, Muhammad M, Omar SZ, Bolong J, Hassan SBH, et al. Information and communications technology acceptance by youth entrepreneurs in rural Malaysian communities: the mediating effects of attitude and entrepreneurial intention. Information Technology for Development. Jan 19, 2016;22(4):606-629. [CrossRef]
    68. Singh A, Ravi P. Adoption of e-health platforms by medical practitioners: Mediating effect of attitude on e-health platforms usage. Health Mark Q. Feb 02, 2022;39(1):61-73. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    69. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. Aug 09, 1989;35(8):982-1003. [CrossRef]
    70. Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. PSYCH. Jul 12, 2018;09(08):2207-2230. [CrossRef]
    71. Bentler PM, Chou C. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research. Jun 30, 2016;16(1):78-117. [CrossRef]
    72. Arkorful VE, Shuliang Z, Muhideen S, Basiru I, Hammond A. An empirical investigation of health practitioners technology adoption: the mediating role of electronic health. International Journal of Public Administration. Sep 19, 2019;43(12):1013-1028. [CrossRef]
    73. Mohamamad A, Yunus AM. Technology acceptance in healthcare service: a case of electronic medical records (ERM). IJARBSS. Dec 18, 2017;7(11):2222-6990. [CrossRef]
    74. Iskandar YHP, Subramaniam G, Majid MIA, Ariff AM, Rao GKL. Predicting healthcare professionals' intention to use poison information system in a Malaysian public hospital. Health Inf Sci Syst. Dec 21, 2020;8(1):6-8. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    75. Sarlan A, Ahmad R, Ahmad W, Dominic P. Users' behavioral intention to use clinic information system: a survey. 2012. Presented at: 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS); June 12-14; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [CrossRef]
    76. Wu I, Li J, Fu C. The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: An integrative perspective. Decision Support Systems. Jun 16, 2011;51(3):587-596. [CrossRef]
    77. Kim SH. Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Information & Management. Sep 19, 2008;45(6):387-393. [CrossRef]
    78. Koul S, Eydgahi A. Utilizing Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for driverless car technology adoption. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. Dec 21, 2018;13(4):37-46. [CrossRef]
    79. Gagnon MP, Orruño E, Asua J, Abdeljelil AB, Emparanza J. Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals' adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemed J E Health. Feb 12, 2012;18(1):54-55. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    80. Liang H, Xue Y, Byrd TA. PDA usage in healthcare professionals: testing an extended technology acceptance model. IJMC. Mar 20, 2003;1(4):372-374. [CrossRef]
    81. Kim S, Garrison G. Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Front. Apr 9, 2008;11(3):323-333. [CrossRef]
    82. Kharuddin AF, Azid N, Mustafa Z, Ku Ibrahim KF, Kharuddin D. Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in estimating the contributing factors to satisfaction of TASKA services in East Coast Malaysia. AJATEL. May 13, 2020;10(1):69-77. [CrossRef]
    83. Abramson J, Dawson M, Stevens J. An examination of the prior use of e-learning within an extended technology acceptance model and the factors that influence the behavioral intention of users to use m-learning. SAGE Open. Dec 21, 2015;5(4):21-22. [CrossRef]
    84. Tadesse Y, Gelagay AA, Tilahun B, Endehabtu BF, Mekonnen ZA, Gashu KD. Willingness to use mobile based e-partograph and associated factors among care providers in North Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. Online J Public Health Inform. Sep 20, 2019;11(2):e10-e11. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    85. Chau PY, Hu PJ. Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management. Jan 11, 2002;39(4):297-311. [CrossRef]
    86. Rouibah K, Abbas H. A modified technology acceptance model for camera mobile phone adoption: development and validation. ACIS 2006 Proceedings. Jun 26, 2006. URL: https:/​/www.​academia.edu/​15351223/​A_Modified_Technology_Acceptance_Model_for_Camera_Mobile_Phone_Adoption_Development_and_validation [accessed 2024-04-25]
    87. Nadri H, Rahimi B, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Samadbeik M, Garavand A. Factors affecting acceptance of hospital information systems based on extended technology acceptance model: a case study in three paraclinical departments. Appl Clin Inform. Apr 24, 2018;9(2):238-247. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    88. Rasmi M, Alazzam MB, Alsmadi MK, Almarashdeh IA, Alkhasawneh R, Alsmadi S. Healthcare professionals’ acceptance electronic health records system: critical literature review (jordan case study). International Journal of Healthcare Management. Feb 05, 2018;13(sup1):48-60. [CrossRef]

    ‎
    AMOS: analysis of moment structure
    TAM: Technology Acceptance Model

    Edited by E Mensah; submitted 04.08.23; peer-reviewed by D Hailu, C Baxter; comments to author 10.12.23; revised version received 26.12.23; accepted 28.12.23; published 10.05.24.

    Copyright

    ©Kefyalew Naniye Tilahun, Jibril Bashir Adem, Wabi Temesgen Atinafu, Agmasie Damtew Walle, Nebyu Demeke Mengestie, Abraham Yeneneh Birhanu. Originally published in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics (https://ojphi.jmir.org/), 10.05.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://ojphi.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.