This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Presentations, Abstracts, or Demonstrations (740)

Published on in Vol 8, No 1 (2016):

Is There a Need for One Health Surveillance (OHS)?

Is There a Need for One Health Surveillance (OHS)?

Is There a Need for One Health Surveillance (OHS)?

Authors of this article:

John Berezowski ;   Judy Akkina ;   Victor D. Vilas ;   Katrina DeVore ;   Fernanda C. Dórea ;   Céline Dupuy Céline Dupuy ;   Melody J. Maxwell ;   Vivek Singh ;   Flavie Vial ;   Laura Streichert
The full text of this article is available as a PDF download by clicking here.
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations Metrics

    The study reports the results of an electronic survey to identify surveillance stakeholder attitudes towards One Health Surveillance (OHS) and a workshop held at the 2014 ISDS conference to identify strategies from improving surveillance. The majority of respondents reported that OHS is valued and needed. Many respondents reported that improving surveillance is of medium to high priority, but that improvements would be difficult to make. Practical approaches for moving forward included cross domain staff exchanges, tools for data integration and reporting diseases across domains.