<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="review-article" dtd-version="2.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMIR</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Online J Public Health Inform</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Online Journal of Public Health Informatics</journal-title>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1947-2579</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>JMIR Publications</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>Toronto, Canada</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25598868</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">v6i3e5533</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5210/ojphi.v6i3.5533</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Roles of Health Literacy in Relation to Social Determinants of Health and Recommendations for Informatics-Based Interventions: Systematic Review</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <elocation-id>e5533</elocation-id>
      <abstract>
        <p>Objectives: Another one million community healthcare workers are needed to address the growing global population and increasing demand of health care services. This paper describes a cost comparison between two training approaches to better understand costs implications of training community health workers (CHWs) in Sub-Saharan Africa.</p>
        <p>Methods: Our team created a prospective model to forecast and compare the costs of two training methods as described in the Dalburge Report - (1) a traditional didactic training approach (“baseline”) and (2) a blended eLearning training approach (“blended”). After running the model for training 100,000 CHWs, we compared the results and scaled up those results to one million CHWs.</p>
        <p>Results: A substantial difference exists in total costs between the baseline and blended training programs. Results indicate that using a blended eLearning approach for training community health care workers will provide a total cost savings of 42%. Scaling the model to one million CHWs, the blended eLearning training approach reduces total costs by 25%.</p>
        <p>Discussion: The blended eLearning savings are a result of decreased classroom time, thereby reducing the costs associated with travel, trainers and classroom costs.  Additional savings can be achieved if the blended eLearning program elects to use a tablet or feature phone with Wi-Fi rather than a smartphone with data plan.</p>
        <p>Conclusion: The results of this cost analysis indicate significant savings through using a blended eLearning approach in comparison to a traditional didactic method for CHW training by as much as 67%. These results correspond to the Dalberg publication which indicates that using a blended eLearning approach is an opportunity for closing the gap in training community health care workers.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
