<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="review-article" dtd-version="2.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMIR</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Online J Public Health Inform</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Online Journal of Public Health Informatics</journal-title>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1947-2579</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>JMIR Publications</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>Toronto, Canada</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23923093</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">v5i2e4669</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4669</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Roles of Health Literacy in Relation to Social Determinants of Health and Recommendations for Informatics-Based Interventions: Systematic Review</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2013</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <elocation-id>e4669</elocation-id>
      <abstract>
        <p>Objective: The sharing of personally identifiable information across organizational boundaries to facilitate patient identification in Utah presents significant policy challenges. Our objective was to create a focus area maturity model to describe and evaluate our progress in developing a policy framework to support data a statewide master person index (sMPI) for healthcare and public health operations and research in Utah. Materials and Methods: We used various artifacts, including minutes from policy guidance committee meetings over a span of 18 months, a report from Utah’s Digital Health Services Commission, and a draft technical requirements document to retrospectively analyze our work and create a focus area maturity model describing the domain of policy needed to support the sMPI. We then used our model to assess our progress and future goals. Conclusions: The focus area maturity model provides an orderly path that can guide the complex process of developing a functional statewide master person index among diverse, autonomous partners. While this paper focuses on our experience in Utah, we believe that the arguments for using a focus area maturity model to guide the development of state or regional MPIs is of general interest.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
