<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="2.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMIR</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Online J Public Health Inform</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Online Journal of Public Health Informatics</journal-title>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1947-2579</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>JMIR Publications</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>Toronto, Canada</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">v5i1e4445</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5210/ojphi.v5i1.4445</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Roles of Health Literacy in Relation to Social Determinants of Health and Recommendations for Informatics-Based Interventions: Systematic Review</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2013</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <elocation-id>e4445</elocation-id>
      <abstract>
        <p>We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the ICD-9 coding system for surveillance of chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HBV) using data from an observational cohort study. All HBV cases were validated by chart review. Of 1,652,055 adult patients, 2,202 (0.1%) were included in the cohort based upon laboratory data or hepatitis B ICD-9 codes. Use of one ICD-9 code had a sensitivity of 83.9%, positive predictive value of 61.0%, and specificity and negative predictive values &amp;gt; 99%. Our findings suggest that use of one or two hepatitis B ICD 9 codes can identify cases with chronic HBV infection.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>